\relax 
\citation{Bazzaz1996}
\citation{Bazzaz1996}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {chapter}{\numberline {5}Lotka--Volterra Interspecific Competition}{135}}
\@writefile{lof}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\@writefile{lot}{\addvspace {10\p@ }}
\newlabel{cha:lotka-volt-intersp}{{5}{135}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.1}{\ignorespaces Changes in abundances of six species of \emph  {Aster}, \emph  {Euthamia}, and \emph  {Solidago} during early secondary succession. This turnover of perennial weeds appears mediated by competition for light, among other factors \cite  {Bazzaz1996} (data from the long-term Buell-Small Succession study [http://www.ecostudies.org/bss/]).}}{135}}
\newlabel{fig:weeds}{{5.1}{135}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.1}Discrete and Continuous Time Models}{136}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1.1}Discrete time model}{136}}
\newlabel{eq:ch4.disc.log.gro}{{5.1}{136}}
\newlabel{eq:ch5.pop1}{{5.2}{136}}
\newlabel{eq:ch5.pop2}{{5.3}{136}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Code for a model of discrete logistic competition}{137}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1.2}Effects of $\alpha $}{137}}
\newlabel{eq:alphD}{{5.4}{137}}
\citation{Kingsland:1985kx}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.2}{\ignorespaces Discrete population growth of two competing species. Both species have the same intraspecific competition coefficient, $\alpha _{ii}=0.01$. In the absence of interspecific competition, both species would reach $K$. However, they both have negative effects on each other ($\alpha _{ij} >0$), and species 1 (solid line) has a greater negative effect on species 2 ($\alpha _{21} > \alpha _{12}$). }}{138}}
\newlabel{fig:ic1}{{5.2}{138}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Discrete logistic competition dynamics (Fig. 5.2\hbox {})}{138}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1.3}Continuous time model}{139}}
\newlabel{eq:N2a}{{5.5}{139}}
\newlabel{eq:N2b}{{5.6}{139}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5.1}{\ignorespaces Parameters of the continuous 2 species Lotka-Volterra competition model. The rest of the chapter explains the meaning and motivation.}}{139}}
\newlabel{tab:cc}{{5.1}{139}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Continuous logistic competition}{140}}
\newlabel{eq:K1}{{5.7}{140}}
\newlabel{eq:K2}{{5.8}{140}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.2}Equilbria}{140}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2.1}Isoclines}{141}}
\newlabel{eq:N2iso}{{5.10}{141}}
\newlabel{fig:Nison2}{{5.3a}{142}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:Nison2}{{(a)}{a}}
\newlabel{fig:Nison1}{{5.3b}{142}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:Nison1}{{(b)}{b}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.3}{\ignorespaces Phase plane plots of each of the two competing species, with Lotka-Volterra zero growth isoclines. Arrows indicate independent population trajectories.}}{142}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Species 2 isocline}}}{142}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Species 1 isocline}}}{142}}
\newlabel{fig:Niso1}{{5.3}{142}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Graphing an Isocline}{142}}
\newlabel{eq:N1iso}{{5.11}{143}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2.2}Finding equilibria}{143}}
\newlabel{eq:lvn1eq}{{5.12}{143}}
\newlabel{eq:lvn2eq}{{5.13}{143}}
\newlabel{eq:1}{{5.14}{144}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Coexistance --- the invasion criterion}{144}}
\newlabel{eq:coex1}{{5.2.2}{144}}
\citation{Bolker2003a}
\newlabel{eq:N1crit1}{{5.15}{145}}
\newlabel{eq:N1criterion}{{5.16}{145}}
\newlabel{eq:N1criterion}{{5.2.2}{145}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Other equilibria}{145}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Species 1 can invade when rare, but species 2 cannot (Fig. 5.4b\hbox {}).}{145}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Species 1 cannot invade when rare, but species 2 can (Fig. 5.4c\hbox {}). }{145}}
\citation{Morin1999a}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Neither species can invade when rare (Fig. 5.4d\hbox {}).}{146}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.3}Dynamics at the Equilibria}{146}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3.1}Determine the equilibria}{146}}
\newlabel{lvisob}{{5.4a}{147}}
\newlabel{sub@lvisob}{{(a)}{a}}
\newlabel{lviso1}{{5.4b}{147}}
\newlabel{sub@lviso1}{{(b)}{b}}
\newlabel{lviso2}{{5.4c}{147}}
\newlabel{sub@lviso2}{{(c)}{c}}
\newlabel{lviso0}{{5.4d}{147}}
\newlabel{sub@lviso0}{{(d)}{d}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.4}{\ignorespaces Phase plane diagrams of Lotka-Volterra competitors under different invasion conditions. Horizontal and vertical arrows indicate directions of attraction and repulsion for each population (solid and dased arrows); diagonal arrows indicate combined trajectory. Circles indicate equilibria; additional boundary equilibria can occur whenever one species is zero.}}{147}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Stable coexistence}}}{147}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Species 1 wins}}}{147}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(c)}{\ignorespaces {Species 2 wins}}}{147}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(d)}{\ignorespaces {Founder wins}}}{147}}
\newlabel{fig:LVIsoclines}{{5.4}{147}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Finding equilibria}{147}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3.2}Create the Jacobian matrix}{148}}
\newlabel{eq:Jac5}{{5.20}{148}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Finding partial differential equations and the Jacobian matrix}{149}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3.3}Solve the Jacobian at an equilibrium}{149}}
\newlabel{eq:jac}{{5.21}{149}}
\citation{Roughgarden1998}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Evaluating the Jacobian matrix}{150}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3.4}Use the Jacobian matrix}{150}}
\newlabel{eq:2x}{{5.22}{150}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5.2}{\ignorespaces Interpretation of eigenvalues of Jacobian matrices.}}{151}}
\newlabel{tab:eiginterpret}{{5.2}{151}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Eigenanalysis of the Jacobian matrix}{151}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3.5}Three interesting equilbria}{151}}
\newlabel{eq:8}{{5.23}{151}}
\citation{Hastings2004a}
\citation{Bolker2003a}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Stable equilibrium -- $\beta _{ij},\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} \beta _{ji} <1$}{152}}
\newlabel{fig:LVeigContour}{{5.5a}{152}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:LVeigContour}{{(a)}{a}}
\newlabel{lvstabstab}{{5.5b}{152}}
\newlabel{sub@lvstabstab}{{(b)}{b}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Contour view of $\lambda _1$}}}{152}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Trajectories of $N_1,\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em} N_2$ for $\beta <1$}}}{152}}
\newlabel{fig:LVeig}{{5.5}{152}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Unstable equilibria -- $\beta _{ij}, \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} \beta _{ji} > 1$}{152}}
\newlabel{fig:LVeigContourU}{{5.6a}{153}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:LVeigContourU}{{(a)}{a}}
\newlabel{lvstabun}{{5.6b}{153}}
\newlabel{sub@lvstabun}{{(b)}{b}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.6}{\ignorespaces Unstable equilibria: as the relative strength of interspecific competition increases ($\beta _{ij} > 1$), instability increases ($\lambda _1 > 0$). \subref  {fig:LVeigContourU} $\lambda _1$ increases as $\beta $ increases, \subref  {lvstabun} the unstable equilibrium may attract trajectories from some initial states, but repel from others (solid dots represent initial abundances).}}{153}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Contour view of $\lambda _1$}}}{153}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Trajectories of $N_1,\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em} N_2$ for $\beta <1$}}}{153}}
\newlabel{fig:LVeigU}{{5.6}{153}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Eigenanalysis of the Jacobian where $\beta _{ij}, \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} \beta _{ji} > 1$}{153}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{Neutral equilibria --- $\beta _{ij} = \beta _{ji} = 1$}{154}}
\newlabel{eq:lim}{{5.24}{154}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.7}{\ignorespaces Trajectories of $N_1,\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} N_2$ for $\beta _{12},\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\beta _{21}=1$. The entire isocline is an attractor, a neutral saddle, and the final abundances depend on the initial abundances and the ratio of $\alpha _{11}:\alpha _{22}$. The circle represents our one derived equilibrium (eq. 5.24\hbox {}).}}{154}}
\newlabel{lvstabneut}{{5.7}{154}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Eigenanalysis of the Jacobian where $\beta _{ij} = \beta _{ji} = 1$}{155}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.4}Return Time and the Effect of $r$}{155}}
\newlabel{eq:rt4}{{5.26}{156}}
\newlabel{eq:3}{{5.27}{156}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.8}{\ignorespaces For small $\beta _{ij}$ ($\alpha _{ij} < \alpha _{jj}$), return time is positive because some time will lapse before the system returns toward to its equilibrium. For large $\beta _{ij}$ ($\alpha _{ij} > \alpha _{jj}$), return time is negative, because it would have been some time in the past that this system was closer to its (unstable) equilibrium. ($\alpha _{ii} = 0.01$)}}{156}}
\newlabel{fig:RT}{{5.8}{156}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Effect of $r$ on stability and return time}{157}}
\newlabel{fig:LVeig3DAll}{{5.9a}{157}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:LVeig3DAll}{{(a)}{a}}
\newlabel{fig:eig3DAllhalf}{{5.9b}{157}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:eig3DAllhalf}{{(b)}{b}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.9}{\ignorespaces The dominant eigenvalue of the Jacobian matrix varies with $r$ as well as with $\beta $ --- higher $r$ causes greater responsiveness to perturbations around an internal equilibrium. \subref  {fig:LVeig3DAll} $r=1$, \subref  {fig:eig3DAllhalf} $r=0.5$.}}{157}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {$\lambda _1$ with $r=1$}}}{157}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {$\lambda _1$ with $r=0.5$}}}{157}}
\newlabel{fig:LVeigR}{{5.9}{157}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5.5}Summary}{157}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{Problems}{158}}
\newlabel{prob:LVbasic}{{5.1}{158}}
\newlabel{prob:relabundance}{{5.2}{158}}
\newlabel{prob:partderivcomp}{{5.3}{158}}
\newlabel{prob:LVTotal}{{5.4}{158}}
\newlabel{prob:Routh}{{5.5}{158}}
\newlabel{prob:LVJac}{{5.6}{158}}
\@setckpt{Chap05/Chapter05}{
\setcounter{page}{160}
\setcounter{equation}{27}
\setcounter{enumi}{4}
\setcounter{enumii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiii}{0}
\setcounter{enumiv}{0}
\setcounter{footnote}{7}
\setcounter{mpfootnote}{0}
\setcounter{part}{2}
\setcounter{section}{5}
\setcounter{subsection}{0}
\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}
\setcounter{paragraph}{0}
\setcounter{subparagraph}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{9}
\setcounter{table}{2}
\setcounter{chapter}{5}
\setcounter{theorem}{0}
\setcounter{prob}{6}
\setcounter{merk}{0}
\setcounter{pp@next@reset}{0}
\setcounter{parentequation}{0}
\setcounter{float@type}{4}
\setcounter{KVtest}{0}
\setcounter{subfigure}{0}
\setcounter{subfigure@save}{2}
\setcounter{lofdepth}{1}
\setcounter{subtable}{0}
\setcounter{subtable@save}{0}
\setcounter{lotdepth}{1}
\setcounter{FancyVerbLine}{1}
}